The concept of technical debt can vary in precision or, more commonly, be interpreted quite freely by each team member. In brief, using one of the most common examples and simplifying it, technical debt entails software developers employing a temporary solution to address a problem or error or creating a new function in the project. The proper permanent solution must replace this temporary patch later. While this is a typical scenario for technical debt, it is not the sole one.
In certain instances, debt accumulation leads to disastrous financial consequences such as bankruptcy,
project destruction, and even demise. Coping methods often mirror crisis management approaches: taking risks, restructuring, and closure. Professional financiers may propose alternative solutions, but my current interest lies not in dealing with the problem but in understanding its sources and causes. I advocate for pre-planning rather than stress management, although my preferences have minimal impact on reality.
I identify several factors that critically predispose projects to technical debt. So, what is the most common reason for piling up "kludges" in your project?